Skip to content
UHUltimate Harness

Review Gates

Gate 1 — Mission completeness

Section titled “Gate 1 — Mission completeness”
  • Goal is clear.
  • Context files are ordered.
  • Constraints and non-goals are explicit.
  • Expected outputs are named.
  • Verification requirements exist.

Gate 2 — Runtime compatibility

Section titled “Gate 2 — Runtime compatibility”
  • Adapter supports required capabilities.
  • Sandbox backend is available.
  • Required skills can be loaded or approximated.

Gate 3 — Spec compliance

Section titled “Gate 3 — Spec compliance”
  • Output satisfies linked issue/spec/mission criteria.
  • Any deviations are documented.

Gate 4 — Quality

Section titled “Gate 4 — Quality”
  • Changes are coherent, minimal, and maintainable.
  • Docs are navigable and understandable.
  • Code, when present, follows project conventions.

Gate 5 — Security/sandbox

Section titled “Gate 5 — Security/sandbox”
  • No unexpected writes outside sandbox.
  • No secrets stored in artifacts.
  • Risky commands/actions are documented.

Gate 6 — Human promotion approval

Section titled “Gate 6 — Human promotion approval”
  • Human reviewer approves selected changes for canonical state.
  • Promotion record is written.